New here? Register. ×
×

Four decades later, settlements outstanding

no comments
19Feb

By: Graham Lane
Posted 09/03/2015

The Northern Flood Agreement was entered to into in 1977. Manitoba Hydro and the federal and provincial governments agreed to compensate members of five First Nations for the negative effects of Hydro’s pre-1980 northern developments.

The consortium committed to provide four acres of new land for every acre flooded, expand and protect indigenous wildlife harvesting rights, pay $5-million for economic development projects for those five communities and provide aboriginal employment opportunities. The agreement, strengthened in 1996 with respect to compensating individual claimants, deals with “any adverse effects to the lands, pursuits, activities and lifestyles of reserve residents.”

Was a cost for fulfilling the commitments ever forecast?

Hydro’s 2015-16 annual report indicates that the Utility has so far recorded costs of $1.06 billion for mitigating the effects of it’s northern developments. Despite seemingly ever-growing costs and the passage of almost 40 years, negotiations still continue with about 320 remaining individual claimants. Claims were required to be filed by 2001.

Six Manitoba legal firms represent the remaining claimants. Hydro is represented by Thompson Dorfman Sweatman, a major Winnipeg legal firm. Michael Werier, “go to” lawyer for the NDP government, acts as arbitrator of disputed claims.

Despite the passage of 38-years since the signing of the Northern Flood Agreement, an office is still maintained at 363 Broadway.

How can it be that despite the passage of almost four decades since the projects related to the NFA were completed and 14-years after the last date for filing claims that more than 300 individual claims remain outstanding? While the lawyers for the remaining claimants received partial compensation for their work until 2011, nothing since. Contrarily, Hydro’s lawyer and the government-appointed arbitrator is regularly paid by Hydro.

Meters running, lawyers are slowly winnowing down the claims and some were found to be without merit. It remains unclear how many of the remaining claims will survive the ongoing testing process. Once this process has been concluded, settlement processes will take place with arbitrator Werier making the final decisions. Approved claims are to paid with interest.

Incredibly, a decision has yet to be made as to whether claims survive the death of claimants. Of the individual claims. many claimants are elderly and some have already died.

How is it possible that almost 40 years after the reputed damages individual claims remain outstanding? And, where exactly went the $1 billion plus Hydro indicates already either paid or provided for to mitigate damages due to flooding reserve lands for its dams? Will Wuskwatim, finished, and Keeyask, under construction, bring forth new obligations?

Has any external audit of the expenditures made to-date ever been undertaken? Shouldn’t a review of more than a billion dollars of costs factoring into rates be required? Has the federal and provincial governments contributed anything towards Hydro’s costs?

Does the laggard settlement process now underway represent justice for the aging claimants?

The Aboriginal Justice Inquiry reported as to the NFA: “… the reaction from Aboriginal people has been far from positive “¦ Metis and off-reserve Indians “¦ still complain bitterly”.


Graham Lane chairs Manitoba Forward (www.manitobaforward.ca), focused on sound public policy. 
Republished from the Winnipeg Sun online edition September 03, 2015.

Leave a Reply

Education

open all posts

Education

Education

Have a story to tell?

NOTE: Manitoba Forward values your privacy greatly. We will never divulge your personal information without your explicit permission. Anonymous tips are welcomed.

Your Name

Your Email

Subject

Your tip or submission

captcha

To stop spam, please enter what you see above

" ]